Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Nat Commun ; 12(1): 4636, 2021 07 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34330906

ABSTRACT

Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is a reemerging mosquito-borne virus that causes swift outbreaks. Major concerns are the persistent and disabling polyarthralgia in infected individuals. Here we present the results from a first-in-human trial of the candidate simian adenovirus vectored vaccine ChAdOx1 Chik, expressing the CHIKV full-length structural polyprotein (Capsid, E3, E2, 6k and E1). 24 adult healthy volunteers aged 18-50 years, were recruited in a dose escalation, open-label, nonrandomized and uncontrolled phase 1 trial (registry NCT03590392). Participants received a single intramuscular injection of ChAdOx1 Chik at one of the three preestablished dosages and were followed-up for 6 months. The primary objective was to assess safety and tolerability of ChAdOx1 Chik. The secondary objective was to assess the humoral and cellular immunogenicity. ChAdOx1 Chik was safe at all doses tested with no serious adverse reactions reported. The vast majority of solicited adverse events were mild or moderate, and self-limiting in nature. A single dose induced IgG and T-cell responses against the CHIKV structural antigens. Broadly neutralizing antibodies against the four CHIKV lineages were found in all participants and as early as 2 weeks after vaccination. In summary, ChAdOx1 Chik showed excellent safety, tolerability and 100% PRNT50 seroconversion after a single dose.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Chikungunya Fever/immunology , Chikungunya virus/immunology , Viral Vaccines/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Chikungunya Fever/prevention & control , Chikungunya Fever/virology , Chikungunya virus/classification , Chikungunya virus/physiology , Cytokines/immunology , Cytokines/metabolism , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Fatigue/chemically induced , Female , Headache/chemically induced , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Injections, Intramuscular , Male , Middle Aged , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/metabolism , Vaccination/methods , Viral Vaccines/administration & dosage , Viral Vaccines/adverse effects , Young Adult
2.
Genet Med ; 22(1): 85-94, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31358947

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The translation of genome sequencing into routine health care has been slow, partly because of concerns about affordability. The aspirational cost of sequencing a genome is $1000, but there is little evidence to support this estimate. We estimate the cost of using genome sequencing in routine clinical care in patients with cancer or rare diseases. METHODS: We performed a microcosting study of Illumina-based genome sequencing in a UK National Health Service laboratory processing 399 samples/year. Cost data were collected for all steps in the sequencing pathway, including bioinformatics analysis and reporting of results. Sensitivity analysis identified key cost drivers. RESULTS: Genome sequencing costs £6841 per cancer case (comprising matched tumor and germline samples) and £7050 per rare disease case (three samples). The consumables used during sequencing are the most expensive component of testing (68-72% of the total cost). Equipment costs are higher for rare disease cases, whereas consumable and staff costs are slightly higher for cancer cases. CONCLUSION: The cost of genome sequencing is underestimated if only sequencing costs are considered, and likely surpasses $1000/genome in a single laboratory. This aspirational sequencing cost will likely only be achieved if consumable costs are considerably reduced and sequencing is performed at scale.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/genetics , Rare Diseases/genetics , Whole Genome Sequencing/economics , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/economics , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/instrumentation , Humans , Neoplasms/economics , Rare Diseases/economics , State Medicine , Translational Research, Biomedical , United Kingdom , Whole Genome Sequencing/instrumentation
3.
FASEB J ; 28(3): 1317-30, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24327606

ABSTRACT

Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is an important aprotic solvent that can solubilize a wide variety of otherwise poorly soluble polar and nonpolar molecules. This, coupled with its apparent low toxicity at concentrations <10%, has led to its ubiquitous use and widespread application. Here, we demonstrate that DMSO induces retinal apoptosis in vivo at low concentrations (5 µl intravitreally dosed DMSO in rat from a stock concentration of 1, 2, 4, and 8% v/v). Toxicity was confirmed in vitro in a retinal neuronal cell line, at DMSO concentrations >1% (v/v), using annexin V, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL), 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), and AlamarBlue cell viability assays. DMSO concentrations >10% (v/v) have recently been reported to cause cellular toxicity through plasma membrane pore formation. Here, we show the mechanism by which low concentrations (2-4% DMSO) induce caspase-3 independent neuronal death that involves apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) translocation from mitochondria to the nucleus and poly-(ADP-ribose)-polymerase (PARP) activation. These results highlight safety concerns of using low concentrations of DMSO as a solvent for in vivo administration and in biological assays. We recommend that methods other than DMSO are employed for solubilizing drugs but, where no alternative exists, researchers compute absolute DMSO final concentrations and include an untreated control group in addition to DMSO vehicle control to check for solvent toxicity.


Subject(s)
Dimethyl Sulfoxide/toxicity , Animals , Apoptosis/drug effects , Caspase 3/metabolism , Cell Line , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Male , Rats , Retinal Ganglion Cells/drug effects
4.
Eur Biophys J ; 37(8): 1279-89, 2008 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18654769

ABSTRACT

The presence of microdomains or rafts within cell membranes is a topic of intense study and debate. The role of these structures in cell physiology, however, is also not yet fully understood with many outstanding problems. This problem is partly based on the small size of raft structures that presents significant problems to their in vivo study, i.e., within live cell membranes. But the structure and dynamics as well as the factors that control the assembly and disassembly of rafts are also of major interest. In this review we outline some of the problems that the study of rafts in cell membranes present as well as describing some views of what are considered the generalised functions of membrane rafts. We point to the possibility that there may be several different 'types' of membrane raft in cell membranes and consider the factors that affect raft assembly and disassembly, particularly, as some researchers suggest that the lifetimes of rafts in cell membranes may be sub-second. We attempt to review some of the methods that offer the ability to interrogate rafts directly as well as describing factors that appear to affect their functionality. The former include both near-field and far-field optical approaches as well as scanning probe techniques. Some of the advantages and disadvantages of these techniques are outlined. Finally, we describe our own views of raft functionality and properties, particularly, concerning the membrane dipole potential, and describe briefly some of the imaging strategies we have developed for their study.


Subject(s)
Fluorescent Dyes/analysis , Membrane Microdomains/chemistry , Membrane Microdomains/metabolism , Animals , Lipid Metabolism , Membranes, Artificial , Nanostructures , Proteins/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...